Sigh.... where do we begin with this mess..

It's time for someone to speak up who actually knows the blu-ray format very well to discuss this situation.

This nfo takes into consideration all of the following:
Final.Destination.Bloodlines.2025.PROPER.COMPLETE.UHD.BLURAY-SURCODE
The.Actor.2025.READNFO.BDRip.x264-D3US
D3US.The.True.Story.Behind.The.Releases.2025.READNFO.1080p.BLURAY.x264-D3US
The.Amateur.2025.COMPLETE.UHD.BLURAY.READNFO.REPACK-SharpHD
How.to.Train.Your.Dragon.2025.PROPER.COMPLETE.UHD.BLURAY-DOUHD
Lilo.and.Stich.2025.READNFO.1080p.BluRay.h264-B3LLUM

First I would like to get a few common sense things out of the way.

1. Playlist files have absolutely nothing to do with 'cracking AACS'.
2. There is more than one source to 'keys' and not all are public. D3US/B3LLUM keys are nothing special, any group can (and do) use the same source(s) if they have the supply. It is irrelevant when a key 'publically' appeared. The supply is the only thing that matters

So first of all lets take a look at Final.Destination.Bloodlines.2025.PROPER.COMPLETE.UHD.BLURAY-SURCODE

>> Isn't it odd that right after the same movie(s) appear on p2p, D3US pres?
It is odd, but often its not the case - they often appeared first on p2p which is what led to 'rumors' that D3US often complain about.
In fact this pattern was so predictable it was possible to predict with excellent accuracy what the next D3US pre's would be.
This is all before SURCODE came out with this statement. Eventually the pattern changed and p2p releases started coming out slightly after the scene release, slightly less predictable.

I just want to point out that by this time the suspicious were that there was a supplier supplying both scene and p2p, not that D3US was taking from p2p. This is obviously still extremely bad for obvious reasons but lets continue..

>> What a coincidence then that Final.Destination.Bloodlines.2025.REPACK.COMPLETE.UHD.BLURAY-B3LLUM has an extra playlist file included (00801.mpls), EXACTLY the same as
>> Final Destination Bloodlines 2025 UHD BluRay 2160p HEVC Atmos TrueHD7.1-CHDBits (p2p group)
Yea this is where things take an interesting twist. This is impossible to happen outside of some scenarios (none of which apply to UHD bluray).
Playlist files (mpls) and clip info file (clpi) are created by the authoring software. There are only a small handful of packages that author these discs these days and four finger Freddy can count them with his fingers.
It is not possible for the files to be duplicated this way, period.
What do I mean by some scenarios though?
The normal 1080p bluray titles have various anti-piracy tools/tricks available to them, most which are pretty useless. One of them is obfuscating the playlists. This involves many fake playlists, including many duplicates, to try and trick rippers into getting the correct order of things. It is a pointless protection these days as its easily handled, but also worth noting it doesn't just create a single duplicate playlist - but many. As mentioned, not in use for UHD at all.

>> Now why would a file that isn't on the retail bluray show up ONLY in the p2p and D3US/B3LLUM releases? Curious. Almost as if the p2p group purposely added 00801.mpls there as their watermark...
Unsure if watermark or broken toolset but given it repeated itself several times and ONLY for titles that matched a p2p pattern, it is at least suspicious.
It's also worth noting that there are several other potential watermarks that we wont get into at this time. It will become relevant later on with DOUHD though.

>> How can this be though? A trusted group like D3US/B3LLUM surely wouldn't steal from p2p! We'll leave that for you to decide but we wouldn't be surprised if there were other releases from them
>> also containing p2p group files that shouldn't be there...
There is no question the file should not be there, and the p2p release indeed has it (more on that when we get to The.Actor), but at this stage as mentioned earlier here, the suspicion is that this supplier is playing with both scene and p2p.

>> Also, more than a little strange that they don't pre the COMPLETE release until days after the other rips. Wonder why...
It is hard to argue with this. As others have already noted, this same pattern happened before and had disastrous consequences last time (no one wants a repeat of 2020).
Of course, patterns also change once things come into the light, which in itself is interesting.

Great, now lets dive into The.Actor.2025.READNFO.BDRip.x264-D3US

>> The reason for all these rumors is simple: some people just don't stand a chance at getting a proper release unless they try to discredit others.
This could very well be true regardless.

>> As for what you're calling "proof"-you're referring to a release from a P2P group. First of all, the disc from that group does not contain the file in question. Check our Proof directory
This is where this start unraveling badly. Granted it took awhile to find the chdbits source that was accessible but it clearly showed that the file DID exist (https://imgur.com/5IVPg8F this was the proof that was provided at the time of this accusation)
So one has to wonder, why would D3US blatantly lie about something so obviously easy to verify.

>> What you're seeing is not a watermark from a P2P group; it's a part of the cracking process, necessary when the keys aren't public. Those specific files are only found on our disc, which had to be cracked manually
This statement is the first thing that made me realize that the guys behind D3US may not actually understand a thing about what is involved with a disc supply.
All discs have to be 'cracked manually', that's how it works. What a strange statement to make...

>> Download the P2P release mentioned in that NFO and see for yourself-the file isn't on that disc.
Yeah.. problem is I and many others did just that and found that the file was on the disc, not only for the specific title SURCODE initially propered, but many others.
Makes no sense why someone would double down on such an obvious lie, so now you can see why people started getting more suspicious about them.

These attempts to explain the dependencies only made things worse because if anything it had shown that the guys do not understand processing bluray discs.

Anyway by this point in time there was a fair bit of drama and more releases were propered that were found to have the same pattern as the p2p disc. I don't need to go into any details there. Lets move on
D3US.The.True.Story.Behind.The.Releases.2025.READNFO.1080p.BLURAY.x264-D3US

Before I start with this one I just want to point out that by this time D3US continue to try to avoid explaining anything and keep trying to obfuscate the discussion by repeating useless statements.
This is where things start getting weirder.

>> We are not involved in p2p, we have a legit supply, we have all the discs, we have never used a p2p source. ·
The wording here is important. They most likely genuinely believe they are not involved in p2p but more likely because they choose to turn a blind eye to the actions of their supplier. They continue to fail to properly explain the discoveries against them and double down on the same lies.

>> We have the keys to decrypt our discs and we do this for fun and nothing more. ·
Again, another pointless statement attempt to add meat to an otherwise meatless bbq.

>> All rumours about us are not correct and we can hint that other people have used the same source in the past. ·
Well that surely convinced everything! Oh wait, no it didn't. The fact they keep avoiding a proper explanation is just throwing fuel on the fire by this point. And yes, we know about others using the same source - we will come to that later.

>> So please, let us do what we are here to do and a big middle finger to the haters. ·
By this point they have had ample opportunity to come clean with what is going on. You could argue that the guys were being stupid prior to this, but by now it must be complicity.

This release also contained a rather bizarre spread of proofs, given that the original releases also included proofs?? What exactly was this supposed to prove? Since day one everyone could see the proof included with the release, no one is claiming proofs are fake if that's what you think? Just makes no sense why these were provided.
And the two hash 'proofs'? Congratulations on discovering HashTools I guess because that's all those two random jpg's seem to show.
Again, this is an attempt to obfuscate the discussion by proving a flood of stuff that actually doesn't address a single thing.

On to the next one The.Amateur.2025.COMPLETE.UHD.BLURAY.READNFO.REPACK-SharpHD

This is the part where many people's suspicions were validated. I also want to give props to SharpHD for coming clean about this situation and doing the right thing.
Since SharpHD's NFO was in German, I am using google translate to translate what they say.

>> Some time ago, a supply came to us and said he could decrypt and obtain UHDs. Yeah, of course, we thought that was a great idea.
>> He delivered proofs and all the ISOs ran, even the encodes, fr Brotherhood were flawless.
>> There were no doubts at the beginning, only when we were allowed to print the UHDs 2-3 days later.
>> But even that, we didn't find this unusual, as no one could use it as a source.
>> Since we never had one of these UHDs ourselves, we also did not notice that the playlist contains files that should not be there.
So here we go, exactly as some initially suspected. The issue is 100% with the supplier, and by this point there can be absolutely no doubt that D3US are fully aware of this. And oh look the same 2-3 day pattern that SURCODE claimed of D3US.
It's worth noting now also that some are aware this same situation occurred with SPARKS, thus you can see why people are starting to get greatly concerned.

>> We have separated from the supply of course and we are
>> always for fair competition when racing
After what we have seen so far, very good call!

>> We also distance ourselves from the affected group.
>> We also find their explanation in their release questionable.
>> You should also own up to your mistakes, as we are doing now.

And again, props to you guys for doing this. Yes their explanations are questionable, they don't address anything!
By this point in time we can only assume that D3US are fully aware of the situation with the supplier and choose to ignore it because "Winning".
Will they own up to their mistakes? Of course not, they just triple down on this.

Enter a period of time now where the duplicate playlist issue just magically resolved itself! Wow, what a coincidence right guys?

Lets move on to How.to.Train.Your.Dragon.2025.PROPER.COMPLETE.UHD.BLURAY-DOUHD

>> It seems quite clear that D3US/B3LLUM using the p2p iso, as confirmed by the crc and dates proof provided

The timestamps here are pretty damming to be honest, and its pretty clear that the same decrypted disc supply ended up with p2p - following the exact same pattern we've already seen many times.
As for the CRC, well we will come to that soon.

>> Yet the files inside B3LLUM ISO show that it's been ripped from 2025-08-04, We asked ourselves why hold back the title?
Well it's pretty clear from what SharpHD admitted :)

>> How to Train Your Dragon 2025 UHD BluRay 2160p HEVC Atmos TrueHD7.1-MTeam has the exact same TIME STAMP as
>> How.to.Train.Your.Dragon.2025.COMPLETE.UHD.BLURAY-B3LLUM This can't be a coincidence
Indeed

>> Compared to DOUHD, the right side which shows the date decryption UHD keys was available. Is the STREAM modified date different because they removed the p2p playlist this time?
I wouldn't normally trust timestamps 100% to begin with but this is yet another coincidence in a Olympic size swimming pool of them so far and besides chances for exact same stamp on other stuff? yea....
This will just be another thing the group knows to fix now that it has been exposed though.

>> Also added proof how.to.train.your.dragon.2025.proper.complete.uhd.bluray-douhd.disc.proof.crc.hash which is identical to MTEAM
>> And B3LLUM, yet DOUHD have different CRC HASH.
Will touch on this later.

And this finally brings me to Lilo.and.Stich.2025.READNFO.1080p.BluRay.h264-B3LLUM

>> Notes: DOUHD has been spreading some nonsense, so let's clear a few things up.
By this point in time everyone would LOVE if they actually did clear a few things up because all you have done to date is avoid doing just that!

>> They claimed that the CRC hash is always the same if you rip the same movie using MakeMKV, even if it's from a different disc. That's simply not true - it's not valid proof of anything.
Would be great if you could expand on that but given your previous attempts at statements its clear you don't actually know anything about bluray discs at all.
DOUHD's disc is the same disc as yours, not even sure why you mention "different disc" as that is not mentioned in the DOUHD nfo at all.
If you claim that the CRC is NOT always the same, then why is it the same for you and the p2p source?
Let me tell everyone why. Because, as per the playlist duplication issue previously, there is another pointless change made to the m2ts files which can only be explained as a potential watermark.
There is a modification to the Copy Control Descriptor that is NOT normal (One of the retention flags is set to 11111100 where it's always unused and 11111111).
This is the reason for the hash mismatch, if your supplier didn't fiddle with that the hashes would be an exact match.
This makes no sense and I'm sure as always its just a coincidence that the p2p release has exactly the same watermarking. There is more too, that is unnecessary to dive into at this stage.

>> They also said we were "holding it back" - and do you know why? Because the disc keys weren't public yet. But once we released the full disc, guess what happened? The keys still weren't public, and suddenly GAZPROM came out with a "proper" - clearly using our disc to re-encode.
Keys were out, that is not why you were holding it back at all and you know it - it's already been address above. GAZPROM appear to use only one source for keys but that is not for me to say as its not the point.

>> The truth is, GAZPROM either downloaded a torrent or used our disc to do their re-encode. That's a dirty move, plain and simple.
Maybe they did download from a torrent, I guess the key is indeed out eh. Stop with these pointless statements that attempt to obfuscate the real issues you refuse to address.

>> To be clear: we don't use anything from P2P - did you ever consider that? It's always the other way around: they use our discs and repackage them, just like most P2P groups do.
"You" may not use anything from p2p, but its blatantly clear your supplier has something to do with p2p. Stop with the obfuscation and come clean.
Most of the time p2p is first, not you - especially before SURCODE's first proper. Sometimes groups get the order of releases mixed up because relying on leaks from mteam/chdbits (they are private after all) is not reliable and results in an incorrectly assumed date (when the real date is earlier). And again, others were able to accurately predict your next pre's for a period of time, so this is not news.

>> The last thing nobody was ever a part of SharpHD from us!
Of course, because the 'supplier' is not part of you either, just as per the SharpHD situation they mentioned. Stop with the obfuscation and come clean.

>> Their release is an invalid proper and a late one at that - completely useless. There's no proof supporting their claims at all.
It's actually perfectly valid on the datetime stamps alone, let alone the blatantly obvious crc issue. Your not the first scene group to have accusations of a p2p connection and you won't be the last.

The one thing that has been painfully clear to everyone is that you do NOT KNOW ANYTHING about how processing bluray discs work, PERIOD. The moment you tried to claim a playlist is used as part of the cracking process you lost any and all credibility.
By this point in time you are willingly being involved in this process rather than owning up to it like SharpHD did.
Stop OBFUSCATING with bullshit statements and either own up or attempt to explain, because all you keep doing is making the situation worse. Respect has to be earn't, and you got absolutely zero of that while you keep doubling down on lies.

ONE MORE THING

There is ONE more thing I would like to address, thats a big elephant in the room.
The.Rule.of.Jenny.Pen.2024.COMPLETE.BLURAY-D3US
The.Legend.of.Ochi.2025.COMPLETE.BLURAY-D3US
Batman.Ninja.2018.2160p.UHD.BluRay.h265-D3US
Batman.Ninja.2018.2160p.UHD.BluRay.x265-D3US
Curdled.1996.2160p.UHD.BluRay.h265-D3US

>> We are currently looking for people who live USA with 50mbit+ upload from any where from the USA also
>> if you are able to get pre retail Movies from any local shop would be helpfully as well email us! kind regards
I'm excluding the email address but anyone can see this if they want.

I don't even know where to start with this. Do you think you are some small time ebook/0day group recruiting crackers for shareware applications?
Are you completely ignorant to just how hard the FEDS love to come down on movie distribution?
It is beyond absolutely stupid that you would even ENTERTAIN that recruiting suppliers in a NFO for a movie group is a good idea.
This is a VERY SERIOUS breach in security trust and should absolutely alarm the shit out of anyone remotely close to D3US/B3LLUM or even their little side german groups.
If anyone is looking for free health-care and wants to have some fun before getting caught up in another SPARKS bust, here is your window of opportunity!

Before you come crying, blaming everyone but yourselves. This was written by someone that is NOT affiliated with any of the groups mentined above, nor any of the groups D3US/B3LLUM has called out in their NFO's.
// BULLSHITDETECTOR